This Month
August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  Value at Any Price

Value at any Price

 

As you leave college, you will go out into the world of ‘real’ medicine.  There are three (at least!) obstacles that you will meet. 

 

Firstly, there is the general ignorance of what we do – but don’t assume that because TCM makes perfect sense to you, it will to everyone else. There will always be a large proportion of the population that will never see past the needle.  Also, don’t assume that speaking to every WI who will listen to you will educate and otherwise spread the word; I’ve tried it but with only minimal success (but hey, maybe that’s me!).

 

Secondly, there are the other complementary therapists.  These range from the credible to (let’s face it) the somewhat ‘flakey’.  Again, it depends where you want to be positioned; don’t forget, you are judged on the friends you keep – the same applies to the professional colleagues you keep.

 

Thirdly, there is ‘conventional’ medicine.  The term ‘conventional’ always amuses me for a system that’s really only a few hundred years old, is science-only validated and, essentially, only considers the physical world.  However, it is this society’s medicine of preference, and so we have to live with/in it.

 

The National Health Service, in the 60 years it has existed, has prided itself on the fact that it is ‘free’ at point of delivery.  With the exception of some small things like dental, prescription and hospital car park charges, this is the case.  It strives to address all illness but NICE is continuously having difficulties allocating resources, especially as some of the modern drugs are so expensive.

 

Which brings us to the cost of this ‘free’ service.  I understand that twice as much of the expenditure of the pharmaceutical industry goes on marketing (some 31%) as goes on research (14%) (did you think these companies were altruistic in what they did?), yet the cost of drugs to its customers (the NHS included) has raised it to the third largest industry in the UK – after Tourism and Finance.  15% of the NHS budget (some £7000m) is spent on prescribed drugs, 80% of which are patented.  And the total cost of the NHS budget represents some 7.2% pa of the national wealth – not surprising when you see the above spending on drugs, the recent average doctors’ pay rising to £100K pa, etc.

 

And this, because the costs of it are removed from us at source, is considered to be a ‘free’ service.

 

Like all bureaucracies, it is inflexible and very expensive to administrate.  Fixed in it’s ways, politically, administratively and clinically, it has great difficulty in accepting that there is another way to do things – this then rubs off on its patients who are channelled into thinking that the NHS is the only way to go; like Edward Bear in AA Milne’s ‘Winnie The Pooh’ they don’t know any different.

 

“Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head, behind Christopher Robin.

 

It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming downstairs, but sometimes he feels that there really is another way, if only he could stop bumping for a moment and think of it.”

 

But let’s step back a pace and see the ‘essence’ within this framework.

 

There is a symbiosis between large industry and the political structure – so that each supports the other to exist.  This was seen very clearly during the years of the ‘Cold War’ when both Western and Eastern political systems were supported by enormous weapons industries.  When the Berlin Wall fell, so did this mutual dependence, and both parties returned to a more realistic footing.  The language of the Cold War was interesting – anyone who argued against it was seen as a traitor and, indeed, in the latest ‘War’, that on terrorism, the USA said that whoever wasn’t with them, was against them.

 

The same can be seen with the Pharmaceutical Industry, the NHS and Government – pity the career of a politician who dares talk of introducing part of the medical cost to the individual, and there are enough drugs industry-funded research conclusions that indicate that even more should be spent on their products (witness the latest report on non-mainstream cancer research). 

 

So because we live in a society that is told it has no option, and that the service is ‘free’, we can take advantage of it willy-nilly.  Therefore:

 

WE CAN ‘AFFORD’ TO BE ILL

 

I see it daily – so many complaints would not exist if people had to pay directly for their healthcare.  Low-cost or free solutions would be found to many complaints.  Exercising, eating sensibly, self-sufficiency would all become popular if it avoided spending money on medicine.  Old Wives’ Tales would be listened to and acted upon (they didn’t come about by accident). 

 

Instead we have a medical system that, AT ‘NO COST’, supports the unfit, the overweight, the self-indulgent and those suffering from ‘imaginary illnesses’ by pumping them full of chemicals that suppress their symptoms, and coming up with even further excuses like the recently announced ‘fat gene’, and so on.

 

So, in creating a universal and ‘free’ health service, we have effectively made the nation unwell.  And who said that Chinese culture was full of paradoxes?

 

Clients come to me waving sheets of prescription, sometimes almost like a badge of honour, telling me that they feel unwell and what can I do about it.  More often than not the majority of the items listed are there simply to counteract the effects of the others (don’t get me started on the efficacy or otherwise of drugs testing, the high level of major side-effects or the number of prescriptions that are wrongly prescribed!).

 

So I have people who come because: “I don’t want to take drugs”, “I don’t want to go into hospital (for fear of Hospital Acquired Infections)”, “the doctor’s can’t do any more for me” or, the old favourite, “you’re my last resort”.

 

AND ANOTHER THING ……..

 

Despite spending approximately £500 million per year on treating back-pain (not to mention the cost of absence from work to the employers), the NHS still does not go for the preferred option.  I was reminded of this on hearing the news today that Alexander techniques achieved a better sustained benefit than either massage or exercise; a year ago the BMJ published a study which concluded that acupuncture is the cheapest way of treating lower back pain – despite higher initial costs, the long-term improvement in patients’ condition mean it works out cheaper in the long run than conventional Western Medicine.  And yet neither sufferers nor taxpayers are getting what they want, namely pain relief and economy respectively – if the NHS does not provide what is wanted by those who fund the service or those who receive the service, then it does beg the question ……..!

 

…………….

 

So if, in your first few years of practice, you feel you are swimming uphill, then that’s because you are.  But, after all of that, the incredible sense of achievement you will get in fixing someone’s ailment, I believe, beats anything you’d get from working in a ‘conventional’ environment (judging by the low levels of morale and the high levels of stress that I see there).  And the encouraging thing is that people are prepared to pay us to do it; they ‘value’ what we do.

 

Those who empathise with the above may like to read Kevin Baker’s “Empowering the Patient: Perspectives from Western, Psychological and Oriental Medicine” at: www.acupuncture.org.uk/student/articles/empowerment.asp

 

 

Metta

 

View Article  Soft or Hard Centre? You have the Option

 

We have the freedom of choice, but not freedom from choice

 

 

If we follow Lao Tse’s advice in the Tao te Ching, we will solve problems while they are still small.  So we keep our choices open as long as possible and, when we know which one to go for, then we’re purposeful in achieving it.  Again, we come back to good ol’ ‘Wu Wei’ – allow the obvious choice to present itself; forcing a choice is almost invariably wrong.   So we stay alert and ready to make a decision as required; we could do a lot worse than follow the Duke of Wellington’s advice to: “keep your bowels open, your powder dry and put your faith in God”

 

I find in my practice that I am presented with choices.  On one hand, I have advertising agents, the landlord etc wanting me to give them money and, likewise I have Government agencies.  In the former, I feel I have a choice, whereas with the latter (notwithstanding what I’ve written above) I feel I don’t.  The interesting thing is that those that really have the whip-hand, namely those organisations that are backed by law, really feel they have to bully me into paying.  This breeds resentment – not a very Taoist or Buddhist emotion.  Sun Tse believed that it was pointless crushing an enemy when you had them beaten; you never know, sometime in the future you may want them to be your friend.

 

I also have a patient who takes this choice thing too far – she negotiates with me “I’ll let you put two needles in here, if you only put one in there …” ;  I’m all for patient involvement, but there is a limit.

 

 

Protect Your Centre

 

 

A recent ‘contretemps’ with the landlord of my practice has served as a good reminder to me of the advice I gave in my last Blog offering, namely to ‘protect your centre’.  This is not only good advice for students but, I suggest, also for all of us throughout our lives. 

 

You may be familiar with Chapter 11 of the Tao te Ching, in which we are compared to a cartwheel, where the spokes and rim perform the function of the wheel but it is the hub that makes it useful (indeed, it goes on to say that the emptiness at the centre is what makes it useful – ‘without its nothingness it would be nothing’).  Osho, in his book ‘Awareness’, further explains:

 

A man can live in two ways: he can live from his periphery or he can live from his centre.  The periphery belongs to the ego and the centre belongs to the being. 

 

If you live from the ego, whatever you do is not an action, it is always a reaction – you do it in response to something done to you.  From the periphery there is no action, everything is a reaction – nothing comes from the centre. In a way, you are just a slave of the circumstances.  You are not doing anything; rather, you are being forced.

 

From the centre, the situation changes diametrically.  From the centre you begin to act; for the first time you begin to exist not as ‘a relata’ but in your own right. 

 

This concept of a ‘centre’, therefore, is vitally important as a form of managing our lives more effectively and even as a form of protection.  Buddhists have this view of our minds being like a herd of wild elephants, never at peace but charging all over the place, creating havoc in their random, reactive path; one of their ways of dealing with this is to ‘connect’ and not ‘attach’ (to people, wealth, health, careers, leases etc).  If we attach to things, then we get dragged off in their direction when they move (or perish), whereas if we simply connect then we are not sucked into their world.  So we ‘attach’ with the ‘periphery’ and ‘connect’ with the ‘centre’.

 

 

So what’s this got to do with me as a student (or, indeed, practitioner)?

 

 

Well, I suppose we all have the choice – to live at the periphery, to live at the centre or, as most of us will do, somewhere in between.   I don’t have a choice” is an interesting expression.  We all have choices all of the time.  What we actually mean is that “I chose to take this route because, if I don’t, something unpleasant will happen”.  As a student at the NCoA, I well remember a fellow inmate complaining that “they are making me do ….”  It had to be pointed out that she was there of her own choice and she numerous options – she was simply ‘reacting’ and thus abdicating responsibility for her own decision. 

 

Your response if you ‘react’ to the work you’re given at College can only ever be partial (ie. from the peripheral).  However, if you ‘act’ to do the work, and accept that you have chosen this course of action (from the centre), then it will be total – and hence you will be ‘in the moment’, ‘alive’ and unburdened whilst you do it.

 

 

Metta

 

 

PS.  I mentioned that this separation concept is also a form of protection – this is a big subject (especially for those dealing in Qi) and deserving of a separate Blog entry at a later date.